Factiverse live fact-checked the US Vice Presidential debate
On a pivotal night for American politics, Factiverse broke new ground by performing live fact-checking on the US Vice Presidential debate between Republican candidate JD Vance and Democratic candidate Tim Walz. Throughout the debate, we managed to detect 259 claims.
Hosted by CBS, this debate was closely watched by voters seeking clarity on key issues like immigration, healthcare, and national defense.
With our advanced AI-driven technology, we were able to transcribe, detect, and fact-check hundreds of claims made by both candidates in real-time.
If you would like to access the data from this debate, please fill out the Google form here: https://forms.gle/3yUPQF3PATHJjXts6
What claims Factiverse detected
Our extremely efficient fact-checking solution accurately transcribed every word spoken by the candidates, detected claims, and began the fact-checking process—all in real-time.
This unprecedented capability provides a powerful tool for news organizations to gather actionable insights into how politicians communicate their policies and opinions.
Our technology presents a leap forward in political transparency, ensuring that claims made by public figures are verified against reliable data sources as quickly as they are spoken.
This initiative marks a significant shift in how debates and political statements are analyzed. No longer must the public wait for post-debate fact-checks to understand whether a statement holds water.
With Factiverse’s real-time solution, misstatements and unsupported claims are flagged as they occur, empowering the public and media outlets with immediate context and clarity.
Here are some examples of claims we analyzed
During the debate, Factiverse’s system identified and categorized numerous claims made by both JD Vance and Tim Walz. While we are still in the preliminary stages of analyzing the data, early insights reveal a broad spectrum of topics discussed.
Claims spanned issues such as immigration, healthcare, and military defense, highlighting the candidates’ priorities and key talking points.
For instance, let’s look at some of the claim examples:
These examples are just a snapshot but they do illustrate the utility of real-time fact-checking in distinguishing between supported arguments and questionable rhetoric.
Harnessing data to improve future fact-checking
The data collected from this debate will be meticulously analyzed and used to refine our models for future events.
Our goal is to create even more accurate and nuanced claim detection mechanisms, ensuring that each statement is thoroughly vetted against the best available evidence.
By training our models on a rich dataset of political discourse, we aim to enhance our ability to capture the intricacies of language, tone, and context in claims made during live events.
What’s next for Factiverse?
As we continue to develop and perfect our live fact-checking product, we are eager to share our findings and data with interested parties. Whether you’re a journalist, researcher, or simply a curious citizen, access to this information could provide valuable insights into the dynamics of political debates.
If you’d like to access the data we gathered from this debate, please fill out our Google form here or email our team at info@factiverse.ai.
We look forward to collaborating with media outlets and other organizations to push the boundaries of real-time political fact-checking.
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
